Covid19: Emerging International Food Trade
and Price Trends and Benchmarking with 2008
History is repeating but differently; This is much wider and deeper than 2008 food trade
trends.
Currently, the
policies of some food exporting countries such as Vietnam, Myanmar, Cambodia,
Russia, etc. could trigger food price spikes and speculative behavior in global
agricultural commodity markets. Example, Vietnam and Myanmar stopped
export of rice just few days back. Russia is mulling to stop Wheat exports.
Myanmar closed the Mant Wain Gate in Muse for the food truck movement to Yunan,
China. Mostly such changes in export policy are set in response to restrictions
imposed by other exporters, particularly for large exporters and in important
products such as staple foods. [Myanmar and Thailand are competing in Chinese
food market.] Such behaviors were the reason for significant increase of food
prices in 2007-10.
The food price
crisis of 2007-2008 shows, however, that policy concerns about food
availability can easily turn into a serious price crisis. At that time, some
countries responded by imposing export restrictions, which pushed up world
market prices of staples, leading other grain exporters to also limit exports,
including India, in efforts to insulate their consumers from the initial food
price rises.
Export Restricted
Products during 2007 – 2010
Argentina
|
Wheat, Maize,
Oilseed (Soyabean, Sunflower)
|
Bolivia
|
Soyabean and
Soyabean oil
|
China
|
Wheat, Rice,
Maize, Soyabean
|
Cambodia
|
Rice
|
India
|
Wheat,
Non-Basmati Rice and Basmati Rice, Maize
|
Egypt
|
Rice
|
Pakistan
|
Non-Basmati Rice
and Basmati Rice
|
Russia
|
Wheat, Barley,
Rapeseed
|
Ukraine
|
Wheat, Barley,
Maize
|
Vietnam
|
Rice
|
(Above cited are just few
examples)
Instruments Used:
Export Tax, Export Quota / Licence, MEP, Even countries specified whom they
will export, Export Window, STE
When prices were
high, importers (obviously rich countries) provided food import subsidies or
lowered the trade barriers [while the response to a low price is the imposition
of tariffs on food products or lower subsidies to imports]. Example,
Saudi Arabia, major importer of basmati rice from India, provided import
subsidy (per metric ton basis) in rice imports.
The experiences of
2008 food prices suggest that the joint imposition of higher export taxes and
lower import tariffs (or higher import subsidies) contracts world supply and
expands world demand, thus resulting in even higher international food price.
During 2007-10, food prices were almost 60 per cent higher than average prices
of the period 1990-2006. This surge in prices had been particularly strong in
some sectors, namely staple foods such as cereals, where the increase in
average prices was higher than 90 per cent. One of the major reasons for
increase in price during 2007 was panic buying of importing countries.
Multinational Corporations were one of the major beneficiaries of the food
price crisis.
There are three major
differences prevailing in current scenario while benchmarking it with 2007-10
food crisis.
a) Presently,
the economic scenario of most of the food-exporting nation is negative. In
2007, the food exporting countries did not have lockdown and contraction of
GDP. Therefore, the present economic climate will force them to look for new
avenues of revenue or additional income. Therefore, the export restrictions are
going to be an inevitable measure for those food-exporting countries to sustain
the economy.
b) In the
current crisis, there is a disruption to international transport and
distribution of key staples, being dry bulk commodities, which can be loaded,
shipped and discharged with human-to-human interaction. Example Cereals. The
ban of ship crew change and ship as well as manpower quarantine time period
reduces the number of vessels engaged, productivity and chartering rate in
international trade. This has direct economic relation with food prices
and supply chain.
c)
During 2007-10 food crisis, the role of WTO was stronger and the DSB was
effectively functioning. Due to the weaker or no WTO in the current
scenario, the food exporting countries will not much bother about compliance of
WTO rules. Of course, the economic emergency situation, now, of these food-exporting
countries will allow them to consider domestic compulsions. Further, the
Bi-polar world and survival of each country in the current scenario would push
them towards new policies in food exports in order to protect social stability
and livelihood, and eventually Balance of Payment.
d) Two important factors such as migration of
seasonal agriculture workers and unknown climate change due to reduction in
pollution level will have its own share of impact on upcoming monsoon season in
quality variations in products.
Every crisis is
different and current one has got much different behavior. The global food
price increase and trade restrictions will become imperative in the coming weeks
and months. The Covid19 crisis presents number of opportunities for India to
become a largest and permanent player in global food market. However, India
needs to recalibrate her food export and import policies very much carefully in
order to protect food security and maximize the revenue - market to market and
product to product - with Bharatiya Value.
Good Article!
ReplyDeleteGood Article & good observation.
ReplyDeleteSir, what you suggest on better business prospective.
Kindly let me your interest - product / market, I could specifically guide. If you need my email id schandru1975@yahoo.com
ReplyDelete